Measure Implementation

Is this measure possible in your Member State under International Judicial Cooperation?

The investigation should concern one of the following criminal offences (Art. 588 ter a in relationship with art.579.1 Criminal Procedural Code): a) Intentional crimes punished with a maximum of, at least, three years’ imprisonment sentence. b) Offences committed within a criminal group or organisation. c) Terrorist offences General requirements: 1. principles of speciality (a measure is related to the investigation of a specific crime), 2. adequacy (the objective and subjective scope and the duration of the measure depending on its usefulness), 3. exceptional nature and necessity (where the investigation, given its nature, does not have other measures available which are less onerous to the fundamental rights of the accused, and when discovering of the facts is seriously hampered without recourse to this measure) 4. proportionality of the measure (when the detriment of the rights and interests at stake is not greater than the benefit that their adoption provides for public interest and third parties). 5. judicial authorization, specifying the technical means to be used. 6. Obligation of providers, agents and persons to provide the assistance and cooperation needed to the judge, the Public Prosecution Service, or members of the Judiciary Police appointed. The judge may order seizure, opening or examination of postal and telegraphic private correspondence, including faxes, certified faxes and money orders, that the accused sends or receives, if there are indications that discovery or verification of some fact or circumstance relevant to the case will be obtained by these means, as long as the subject of the investigation is one of the abovementioned offences. Summary of general requirements: The judge may order, in a grounded decision, observation of the accused’s postal and telegraphic communications, and communications used to carry out their criminal activities, for a period of up to three months, which may be extended by the same, orshorter, period up to a maximum of eighteen months. In the event of urgency, where investigations are carried out to prove crimes related to the operation of armed gangs or terrorist elements and there are grounded reasonswhich make the measure provided for in the previous paragraphs of this articleessential, the Minister for Internal Affairs may order it or, in default, the Secretary of State for Security. This measure will be notified to the competent judge immediatelyand, at any event, within a maximum time limit of twenty-four hours, with a record of the reasons justifying adoption of the measure, the action carried out, the manner in which it was effected and its result. The competent judge, also in a reasoned manner, will revoke or confirm such action within a maximum time limit of seventy-two hours after the measure was ordered. The judge may order seizure, opening or examination of postal and telegraphic private correspondence, including faxes, certified faxes and money orders, that the accused sends or receives, if there are indications that discovery or verification of some fact or circumstance relevant to the case will be obtained by these means, as long as the subject of the investigation is one of the offences listed below. • authorities that are competent to decide on the measure: Investigating Judge and Central Investigating Judge. • time limits for performing the measure: The measure may be adopted for a period of up to three months, which may be extended by the same, orshorter, period up to a maximum of eighteen months

Legal Framework

International legal framework applicable for this measure in your Member State

-Directive 2014/41/EU of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters -Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 1959 -Convention on Cybercrime, Budapest, 23/11/2001

Competent Authority

* receive the request/decision for judicial cooperation

* receive the request/decision for judicial cooperation The Public Prosecutor Office (see Judicial Atlas) if it is an EIO, the competente Judge for DN and IRN. As regards to incoming EIOs the Spanish Public Prosecutor is the new receiving authority or SpOC in accordance to Article 187 (2) of Law 23/2014 on mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters in the European Union as amended in 2018 for the implementation of the EIO 2014 Directive As regards to MLA requests issued by DK or IE the receiving authorities could be either the Public Prosecutor or the Investigating Judge * execute/recognise the measure (if other than the receiving authority) Investigating Judge and Central Investigating Judge

Accepted languages

Accepted languages for the request/decision

The only accepted language is Spanish.

Execution deadline

Deadlines for the execution of the request/decision (where applicable)

-There is not a deadline for the execution of rogatory letters. -The decision to recognise and execute the European Investigation Order or, where applicable, to refuse to execute it shall be taken as soon as possible and at the latest within 30 days of its receipt by the competent authority. Where, in a specific case, the competent Spanish authority finds that the time limit for the recognition and enforcement of the order cannot be met, it shall inform the issuing authority without delay, giving the reasons and stating the estimated time needed to take the decision. In this case, the time limit for issuing the decision on recognition and enforcement may be extended up to a maximum of 30 days. The Spanish competent authority shall carry out the execution of the investigative measure without delay and at the latest within 90 days after the adoption of the decision on recognition and enforcement.

Concise legal practical information

Special requirements

There are not different rules when cooperating outside of UE, only legal basis for this cooperation changes. Special requirements for a measure: -Art. 579.4. Criminal Procedural Code: No judicial authorization shall be required in the following cases: a) Postal consignments that, because of their external characteristics, are not usually used to contain individual correspondence but for freight traffic and transport, or those whose content is declared in the outside. b) Those other methods of dispatching correspondence under the legal format of open communication where an external declaration of its content is compulsory or those including express statement authorising its inspection. c) When the inspection is carried out in accordance with customs regulations or proceeds along the postal standards regulating a certain kind of consignment.

Last reviewed on 29 June 2022 by EJN Secretariat

NEXT MEASURE

  • Electronic evidence, interception and surveillance (A.50 - A.56)
  • A.55 Surveillance and tracking of a person (tracking device being installed/put by an executing state)
next

Export this Judicial Cooperation Measure

File format