Measure Implementation

Is this measure possible in your Member State under International Judicial Cooperation?

Tracking of a person is provided for in French law in the following articles : - Articles 230-32 to 230-44 and following of the Code of criminal procedure - Article 709-1-3 of the same code ; - Articles D15-1-5 and D15-1-7 of the same code ; - Article 67 bis-2 of the Customs Code Tracking is the use of any technical means intended to locate in real time a person (without him being informed), a vehicle or any other object (without the consent of its owner or user). Any object can be tracked, either by exploiting its own technology, or through the installation of a tracker. Both the dynamic tracking of any object and the use of a dedicated tracker device placed on a means of transport or any other object are included in the scope of this investigation technique. However, the following are not included in the scope of this investigation technique : - Operations allowing to trace (not in real time) the movements of an object or an individual, by the communication of the data (in particular the triggered terminals) by the telecommunication operators or any person or public or private organization ; - the dynamic tracking of a telecommunication terminal, a vehicle or any other object whose owner or legitimate possessor is the missing person or the victim of the crime under investigation, when the purpose of these operations is to find the victim, the object that was stolen from him or her or the missing person. The implementation of this measure of tracking is possible for all investigations concerning a crime or misdemeanour punishable by at least three years of imprisonment ; all investigations in search of the causes of death or disappearance and the procedure for the search for a fugitive. The authorization to use a tracking measure always take the form of a written decision, motivated by reference to the elements of fact and law justifying that these operations are necessary. The authorization must also include the following elements : the date of the decision ; the useful elements to identify the object or vehicle ; the maximum authorized duration of the measure, the framework of the investigations and the targeted offence. In the context of an investigation under the responsibility of the public prosecutor, it is authorized by the public prosecutor and then by the liberty and custody judge if the extension of the measure is required. In the context of a judicial investigation under the responsibility of an investigating judge, it is authorized by the investigating judge. The duration of the measure is different according to the framework of the investigations. - Investigation under the responsibility of the public prosecutor : the maximum duration of the measure authorized by the public prosecutor is eight consecutive days (fifteen days for organised crime). Then, the liberty and custody judge, at the request of the public prosecutor, may authorize the extension for a maximum period of one month, renewable under the same conditions. - Judicial investigation under the responsibility of an investigating judge : The maximum duration of the measure authorized by the investigating judge is 4 months renewable under the same conditions of form and duration.

Legal Framework

International legal framework applicable for this measure in your Member State

• EU countries : Directive 2014/41/EU of 3 April 2014 (EIO), Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union of 29 May 2000, • Non-EU countries: the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 20 April 1959, and its protocols or other Convention.

Competent Authority

* receive the request/decision for judicial cooperation

• On the basis of the Directive on EIO of 3 April 2014 : According to article 694-30 of the code of criminal procedure, the EIO issued by the authority of another Member State of the European Union is directly transmitted for recognition and execution to : - the investigating judge that has territorial jurisdiction, if this decision concerns acts that can only be ordered or carried out during a judicial investigation, or which can only be carried out in the course of an investigation with the authorization of the liberty and custody judge ; - or, the public prosecutor that has territorial jurisdiction, in all other cases. • On the basis of the MLA Convention of 29 May 2000 it is the judicial authority that has territorial jurisdiction which receives the request, namely the public prosecutor or investigating judge who has territorial jurisdiction (articles 695-1 et seq. and 694-1 et seq. of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

Accepted languages

Accepted languages for the request/decision

• Directive 2014/41/EU of 3 April 2014 on the European Investigation Order : French. • Convention of 29 May 2000 do not raise any question of translation requirements.

Execution deadline

Deadlines for the execution of the request/decision (where applicable)

• Directive 2014/41/EU of 3 April 2014 on the European Investigation Order : The competent authority must execute it as soon as possible and at the latest within 90 days after the decision of recognition of the EIO. • MLA Convention of 29 May 2000 : The requested State executes the request for mutual legal assistance as soon as possible (art. 4 paragraph 2 Convention of 29 may 2000). There is no deadline for the execution of requests for assistance in French criminal law. However, it is possible, in the body of the request, to ask for a deadline to be observed ; such a deadline will, however, only be regarded as a general guide.

Concise legal practical information

Special requirements

NC

Last reviewed on 30 August 2022 by EJN Secretariat

NEXT MEASURE

  • Electronic evidence, interception and surveillance (A.50 - A.56)
  • A.56 Room surveillance
next

Export this Judicial Cooperation Measure

File format