Measure Implementation

Is this measure possible in your Member State under International Judicial Cooperation?

Hearing minors: In general, the Austrian Code of Criminal Procedure does not make a distinction between the concepts of hearing children and hearing witnesses. However, there are some specialities mentioned down below. Hearing witnesses: As a rule, every witness is heard individually and in the absence of the parties and other witnesses. Persons who are prevented from following a charge due to illness or infirmity, or other circumstances worthy of consideration, may be heard in their home or other place of residence. According to Art 4 of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (20.04.1959), the assistance of participation of agents or other parties of the proceedings (e.g. private party, lawyer) of the requesting State in the execution of the measure is possible and permissible on demand. Hearing victims: In general, Austria's criminal procedure does not make a distinction between the concepts of hearing victims/plaintiffs and hearing witnesses. However, there are some specialities mentioned down below. Hearing experts: The Austrian Code of Criminal procedure does not make a distinction between the concepts of hearing experts and hearing witnesses. Hearing suspects/accused: Before commencing the hearing, the accused is informed of the offence of which he/she is suspected of having committed. The accused also is informed of the fact that his/her testimony serves his/her defence, but that it may also be used as evidence against him/her. He/she is also informed of the fact that he/she has the right to comment on the matter, or not to give evidence and to first consult a defence counsel. He/she is entitled to be accompanied by a defence counsel during the interrogation. However, the accused is not allowed to consult on single questions with his/her defence counsel. According to Art 4 of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (20.04.1959), the assistance of participation of agents or other parties of the proceedings (e.g. private party, lawyer) of the requesting State in the execution of the measure is possible and permissible on demand.

Legal Framework

International legal framework applicable for this measure in your Member State

Directive regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters in relation to Member States; otherwise: European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (20.04.1959); Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (CISA); Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance between Member States of the European Union (29.05.2000)

Competent Authority

* receive the request/decision for judicial cooperation

The public prosecutor’s office with competences for the court district in which the act of judicial assistance is to be performed. If the competences cannot be determined, the public prosecutor’s office in Vienna is responsible. During preliminary proceedings, the practical execution of the measures is performed by the public prosecutor's office who can entrust the criminal police with this duty. Only upon explicit and reasoned request, the hearing can be carried out by a judge. When examinig a witness by using technical equipment for audio and video transmission (= prior adversarial interrogation; prerequisites see below), the court hears the witness. If necessary, an expert can be entrusted with the interrogation in these cases.

Accepted languages

Accepted languages for the request/decision

German, English, French and - in case of reciprocity, if the requesting state would accept a request in German language - also the language of the requesting state.

Execution deadline

Deadlines for the execution of the request/decision (where applicable)

None (requests in urgent cases shall be marked as urgent).

Concise legal practical information

Special requirements

Hearing children: Persons who are incapable of saying the truth because of their young age must not be heard as witnesses, as their testimony would otherwise be null and void. When hearing a witness who has not yet reached the age of fourteen and might have been injured in his/her sexual sphere by the offence, the opportunity to take part in the hearing shall be restricted to such an extent, that the parties in the proceedings and their representatives can follow the hearing and exercise their right to ask questions by using technical equipment for audio and video transmission, without being present during the hearing (= prior adversarial hearing). When hearing minors under the age of forteen, a person of trust has to be present. Hearing victims: Victims have the right to be informed of the subject-matter of the proceedings and of their essential rights prior to their hearing. Particularly vulnerable victims are liberated from their obligation to testify if the parties had the opportunity to participate in a prior adversarial hearing. Persons who are to give evidence against a relative are released from their obligation to testify, unless they have joined the proceedings as a private party. In general, witnesses (and thus also victims) are entitled to be accompanied by a person of trust. Minors under the age of 14 or witnesses suffering from mental disorder must be accompanied by such a person. Some persons must not be heard as witnesses, as their testimony would otherwise be null and void (e.g.: clergymen; state officials subject to official secrecy; members of a committee; persons who are incapable of saying the truth). Persons who are to give evidence against a relative (unless they have joined the proceedings as a private party) and particularly vulnerable victims who have already had an opportunity to take part in an earlier adversarial examination are released from their obligation to testify. The following persons have the right to refuse to give evidence: 1. Persons who would otherwise expose themselves or a relative to the risk of (further) criminal prosecution; 2. defence counsels, attorneys-at-law, patent agents, notaries public and chartered accountants with regard to matters that have come to their attention in their respective capacities; 3. specialists in psychiatry, psycho-therapists, psychologists, probation officers, registered mediators and staff members of recognized institutions for psycho-social counseling and care with regard to the matters that have come to their attention in their respective capacities; 4. media proprietors (publishers), media staff members and staff members of a media company or media service with regard to questions that relate to the person of the author, the supplier of or informant for programs/articles and records or that relate to communications that they received with a view to their activities, 5. persons entitled to vote with regard to their vote if the law states that the election of the voting process is to be by secret ballot. The following persons may refuse to answer individual questions: 1. persons, whenever they would otherwise expose themselves or a relative to disgrace or the risk of an immediate or significant property-law disadvantage; 2. persons who were or might have been violated in their sexual sphere on account of the offence with which the accused is charged, whenever they would have to disclose details of the offence, the description of which is regarded as being unreasonable for them; 3. persons whenever they would have to disclose circumstances of their highly personal living sphere, or the highly personal living sphere of other persons. Under Austrian law, it is also possible to carry out a hearing in a way that the parties in the proceedings and their representatives can follow the hearing and exercise their right to ask questions by using technical equipment for audio and video transmission, without being present during the hearing if necessary in order to protect the witness (e.g. children, particularly vulnerable victims etc). In general, witnesses are entitled to be accompanied by a person of trust. Minors under the age of 14 or witnesses suffering from mental disorder must be accompanied by such a person. Giving evidence under oath is considered to be against the fundamental principles of Austrian law. There shall be compliance with a request for judicial assistance which requires a procedure that differs from Austrian law on criminal procedure, if this is compatible with the criminal procedure and its principles.

Last reviewed on 26 August 2022 by EJN Secretariat

NEXT MEASURE

  • Summoning and hearing persons (A.10 - A.14)
  • A.12 Hearing: by videoconference or other audiovisual transmission
next

Export this Judicial Cooperation Measure

File format